The Federal High Court in Abuja has stopped the Federal Government from executing its plan to deduct $418 million from the bank account of the 36 states of the Federation.
Justice Inyang Ekwo issued a restraining order against the Federal Government on Friday following an ex parte application brought by the counsels to the 36 states, Jibril Otukepa and Ahmed Raji.
While moving the application, Okutepa who led the legal team of the states told the judge that the states would be completely crippled if the federal government should go ahead to deduct the huge amount from the bank accounts of their clients.
while the 36 states Attorney-Generals are the plaintiffs. Some of the defendants listed in the suit include the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Accountant General of the Federation and Ministry of Finance.
Others are Central Bank of Nigeria, Debt Management Office, Federation Account Allocation Committee, Incorporated Trustees of Association of Local Government of Nigeria (ALGON), among others.
According to the motion dated and filed Oct. 27, 43 defendants are sued in the matter. Although four prayers were sought for, Justice Ekwo granted three in the application.
The reliefs sought by Okutekpa include an order of interim injunction, restraining the Federal Government from deducting any money accruing or due to all or any of the 36 states of the federation.
The senior lawyer, who informed the court that the Federal Government had not commenced the deduction of the monies, withdrew the fourth prayer, asking for a refund of the monies deducted.
Okutekpa hinted that the deduction was expected to begin in November.
He said despite his clients’ protest against such action, the defendants had vowed to go-ahead with the deduction. He said if allowed, no state would be able to pay workers’ salaries. Besides, Okutekpa argued that the states were not party to any contract resulting in such debts.
“That is why we ran to your court,” he said. Justice Ekwo, who granted the first three prayers, adjourned the matter until Nov. 30 for motion on notice. “Order as prayed except prayer 4 which the court cannot grant,” he said.
He also ordered that all the defendants be served with the processes.(NAN)
DISCLAIMER
The OPINION / COLUMN is authored by independent contributors to the National Accord Newspaper. While contributors adhere to our editorial guidelines, they are not employed by the National Accord Newspaper. The perspectives and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of the National Accord Newspaper or its staff.
Leave a Reply