
By JOHN ONAH, Abuja –
The FORMER acting Registrar of the National Examinations Council (NECO), Abubakar Gana, has denied the embezzlement allegation levelled against him of N368.875 million while he held sway at the examination body.
According to him, the alleged sum was generated during the June/July 2018 registration of SSCE was discovered missing before his tenure.
Gana, in a statement he personally signed and issued to journalists yesterday in Abuja, insisted that contrary to the online media report, his hands are clean.
He said: “For the avoidance of doubt, I was appointed as acting Registrar of NECO on May 10, 2018, while the purported incident occurred on December 18, 2017, at least, five months before my appointment.
“It must, however, be put on record that the infractions were uncovered by the Council in 2017 under the watchful eyes of former Registrar, Prof Charles Uwakwe, but nothing was done to bring the perpetrators to book.”
According to the statement, “My attention has been drawn to a malicious report of September 25, 2020, in which the online platform alleged that I siphoned N368, 875 million generated during the June/July 2018 registration of SSCE, while I was acting Registrar of NECO.
“Ordinarily, I would not have bothered to dignify the half-truths and fabrications contained in the publication with a response, but for the purpose of setting the records straight.
“For the avoidance of doubt, I was appointed as the acting Registrar of NECO on May 10, 2018, while the purported incident occurred on December 18, 2017, at least, five months before my appointment.
“It must, however, be put on record that the infractions were uncovered by the Council in 2017 under the watchful eyes of former Registrar, Prof Charles Uwakwe, but nothing was done to bring the perpetrators to book.
“When I took over the affairs of the Council in 2018, the misappropriation was officially reported to me, a development that led to the setting up of both management and board committees for investigation.
“Upon our investigations, two officials of the Council were indicted and thereby recommended for dismissal. Not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation, the officials petitioned the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges in the eighth Assembly, which also found them culpable of misappropriation, but however, pleaded for leniency, a request that was rejected by the board.

