The recent announcement by the Benue State Education Quality Assurance Agency to demolish and close “substandard schools” is concerning. While the intent to improve the quality of education is commendable, the approach raises several critical questions and concerns that must be addressed before such drastic measures are implemented.
First, one must ask: How much advocacy and engagement has the Agency conducted with the affected schools and stakeholders? The decision to demolish schools without thorough consultation and adequate public sensitization undermines the principles of inclusive governance and participatory decision-making. Schools, especially those in the private sector, play a crucial role in filling the gaps left by public education. Many of these so-called “substandard schools” may lack resources, but they are often the only accessible option for children in underserved communities. Has the Agency provided these schools with the necessary support or guidelines to meet the required standards before resorting to demolition?
Secondly, is this action backed by law? It is imperative to ensure that any move to close or demolish schools is grounded in legal frameworks that protect the rights of students, parents, and school proprietors. Arbitrary actions not only set a dangerous precedent but also risk legal challenges that could further complicate the state’s educational landscape. The government must ensure that its actions are not only lawful but also just and fair.
Another pressing issue is the condition of public schools in the state. Are public schools better than most of the so-called substandard schools? Before pointing fingers at private institutions, the state government must critically assess the quality of education and infrastructure in its own public schools. The reality in many states, including Benue, is that public schools are often underfunded, overcrowded, and poorly maintained. If the government’s own schools are failing to meet acceptable standards, how can it justify penalizing private schools that are striving, albeit with limited resources, to provide education?
Moreover, is this action not contradictory to the state government’s emphasis on private sector participation in governance and employment? Encouraging private investment in education has been a cornerstone of policy for many years. Private schools not only supplement public education but also contribute to employment and economic activity within the state. The demolition of these schools, rather than aiding their improvement, could stifle private initiative and discourage future investment in the sector.
In light of these concerns, I urge the Benue State government and the Education Quality Assurance Agency to reconsider their approach. Instead of demolishing schools, the government should:
1. Set clear standards and timelines for schools to meet these requirements. This allows schools to gradually improve and align with the state’s educational goals without disrupting the learning process for students.
2. Improve the quality of public schools so that they can become competitive with private institutions. The government should focus on addressing the shortcomings within the public education system, ensuring that all schools, public and private, provide a high standard of education.
3. Encourage and support private participation in education by providing incentives, training, and resources to help private schools meet required standards. This collaborative approach would foster a more inclusive and robust educational environment in Benue State.
By adopting these measures, the state government can achieve its goal of raising educational standards without causing unnecessary harm to students, parents, and the broader community.
