Political activist and publisher of Sahara Reporters, Omoyele Sowore
Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the trial of Omoyele Sowore, publisher of Sahara Reporters, and the media platform itself, until November 20, to allow arguments on all pending applications in a defamation suit.
At Thursday’s proceedings, the prosecuting counsel, E.A. Inegbenoise, told the court that the matter was listed for Sowore’s arraignment. However, he noted that the defence had already filed a preliminary objection challenging the charges, and while he had filed a response, it was only served to the defendants in court that morning.
> “The defence needs time to study our reply and respond accordingly,” Inegbenoise explained.
Counsel to Sowore and Sahara Reporters, Tope Temokun, confirmed receipt of the prosecution’s reply and requested more time to respond.
> “We’ve only just received the process. Both parties have agreed to return on November 20 to argue all pending applications,” Temokun stated.
Also appearing was Marshal Abubakar, who represented Sahara Reporters Incorporated. He registered his presence “in protest” but declined to elaborate when approached by the press after the hearing.
Hamza Dantani, appearing for the Nigerian Bar Association’s Citizens Liberties Committee, was also present in court, indicating wider interest in the case due to its implications for press freedom and civic activism.
Presiding judge Justice Emeka Nwite accepted the parties’ consensus and formally adjourned the case.
> “Since all counsel have agreed, the matter is hereby adjourned to November 20 for hearing of all applications,” the judge ruled.
The defamation case stems from reports published by Sahara Reporters earlier this year, which detailed an alleged promotion scandal within the Nigeria Police Force. The publication also covered protests by retired police officers advocating for pension reforms—protests in which Sowore reportedly took part.
The charges, filed in August, have sparked debate among civil society groups and media watchdogs over the use of legal action to intimidate journalists and suppress investigative reporting.
NAN
